Friday, 31 July 2009 00:00
By Nick Carroll

Recently you’ll have read a bit about rumours of a new, super rich, elite pro surfing ultra-circuit in the offing.
What is it: $1.5 million a contest? Or was it $1.8 million? Were there 12 surfers gonna be involved? Or was it 16? Or 18? Eight events? Six?
Your correspondent thinks it’s time to throw some cold water on it all.
This extra Tour is pure smoke and mirrors.
Here’s how this sorta thing works: a bunch of hyped up go-getters at a US-based sports TV network, in this case ESPN, decide there’s a way in to a small-time pro sport. Maybe they’re tipped off that a major star is unhappy, or something else about the sport is looking shaky. So they work up a proposal, guarantee TV time on their network (but precious little else), and start beating the drums.
Salesmen call it a “float”. Chuck it out there and see if anybody bites.
Unfortunately for ESPN, they don’t have a buyer. Never did. Indeed, they’re trying to sell it to the surf industry.
Perhaps they are hoping the surf industry will respond thus: “Oh OK, here’s $40 million a year of money we don’t have so you can white-ant the world tour that we’ve just spent a decade and a half reshaping in our image.”
They’ve had a few bites, notably from Quiksilver. You can see why Quik might be a little more interested than others; their top young American star, Dane Reynolds, is struggling on the WCT, and their all time King, Kelly Slater, is off the 10th world title run he was expected to make in 2009. If Dane’s not there and Kelly’s bored, world tour-wise they’ve got nothing.
Plus of course Kelly’s energetic manager Terry Hardy has been a central figure in chucking the “float” out there like nobody else.
But otherwise? Huh.
Things like this have been “floated” before. One recalls the IS Tour idea of 1999, “floated” by Derek Hynd with the tacit support of Jack McCoy and a number of never-quite-named wealthy backers; the Super League of 1996, “floated” by Graham Cassidy as an alternative ASP; the stand-alone Triple Crown of 1983, which never quite “floated”, but managed to ruin the career of Hawaiian great Dane Kealoha in the process.
Something amazingly similar to this current proposal, in fact, was “floated” back in the dot-com days by a pro footballer manager named R J Kors, who was working in partnership with ESPN at the time.
Yet R J’s proposals vanished along with the rest. The only time a “float” has taken was in 1982, when Ian Cairns came to the surfers with the idea for the ASP. But the ASP had a backer, it was a full blown global improvement on the very thin-on-the-ground IPS, and every single pro surfer in the world wanted a major change in how things happened.
When these “floats” are chucked out there, it’s always wise to take a cool look at who stands to benefit; and in this case, other than those thrusting ESPN executives, it’s just the 12 surfers who happen to be invited. Or the 18. Or the 16. But how are they chosen? On the basis of popularity with the ESPN execs? And what happens to everyone else?
More dryly even than that: What happens to, err, the chicks?? (Don’t mention the chicks!)
Not a whole lot in it for anyone, in fact, except said TV execs and a small number of yet to be named professional surfers whose careers will no doubt have been long established by their appearances in, oh yeah, ASP WCT events.
One of the big reasons why “floats” generally blow away with the next strong breeze is because – guess what? – professional sports are a lot harder to organise and run than the floaters care to admit. They don’t spring into being out of thin air. Yet nobody outside ESPN has been approached except in the hope of money to fund it. There’s nobody working on a computer judging system. Nobody being employed to develop all the boring yet critical infrastructure that makes multi-event global sports tours function with sanity and credibility. No connections being made within the sport beyond the headline US surf corpos.
ESPN’s got TV time to burn, but other than that, they got nothin’. And until they get somethin’ – a lot more than somethin’, in fact – you can forget about it.
The only sense that’s been talked so far in the whole shemozzle has been by Kelly Slater back in J-Bay, after being encouraged to help the “float” by e-mailing the top 45 to try to get ‘em on side (and then rapidly backing away when he realised he’d suddenly become the floater du jour).
What Kelly said about ASP WCT event timing, about the uneven webcasting, the sluggish response to changing needs in the sport, is quite true. God knows the ASP hasn’t figured out how to work its media property rights. God knows the “Dream Tour” hasn’t changed in years and is beginning to look stagnant. God knows there could be a lot more money, life and energy injected into it. (For the latest ASP initiative click here)
But the best thing pro surfing has going for it is an unopposed, undiluted world championship. It’s what’s put the sport ahead of pretty much all the other supposedly “Xtreme” sports of the past three decades. It’s what has allowed the surf industry to build the global marketing platform it so fundamentally needed – and continues to need – in order to grow its businesses beyond its old Aussie/US base. It lets new surf nations in the door of the sport; gives their top surfers a clear goal.
If you’re going to white-ant that in favour of something else, you want to be damned sure you know why.
EDITOR'S NOTE: ASL has been in contact with Kelly Slater regarding the proposed tour since first reporting on it during the Billabong Pro in South Africa last month. Two days after we published this story, we recieved an email from Kelly which answers quite a few of the questions posed in the comments section below. You can click here for Kelly's thoughts on the proposed tour, and the coverage it's been getting.
Make sure you read our Website Conditions before posting.
© Copyright 2010 Australia's Surfing Life | Competitions Terms and Conditions | Privacy | Contact | Subscribe | Rules of this Site
"Taking bets now" is either:
A) Brodie Carr
B) Richard Grelmann
C) Any other ASP employee desperately trying to cling onto their jobs
D) or possibly Neil Ridgeway
A) Matthew Tinley
B) Terry Hardy
C) Bob McKnight
D) Kelly Slater
E) Greville Mitchell
Mate I don't know the top four enough to comment, but I know Greville Mitchell to be one of the most selfless people ever to be involved in pro surfing. I'd say the rest of the guys on your list have made a bit of coin out of the sport, and fair enough to em... but Mitchell, on the other hand, has only ever given. And given alot.
That is all.
A full year ranking, grand slams on great locations with big money and huge TV coverage. The ranking will provide the seeds to this and that contest. You can have contests for 128 guys, 64, 48, and grand slams could be the best 24 or 32... Everybody would be forced to show up here and there to score points and enter the big events.
Abraço!
Thats about 8 million per programe, based on industry experts estimated 40 million overall budget for this rebel tour. Thats insane, they'd never be able to recoup that outlay in advertising- never, ever, even in a strong advertising market.
As far as non-surfing corporates, coke has had involvement in surfing and various beer & phone companies such as boost. Guess what if it worked for them they'd be back quicker than you blink.
people get over it- prosurfing is not that popular- never will be. It's a niche sport that get backing from surfing companies.
Your article is getting hammered at PostSurf.com
There is no moat surrounding the the AS freaking P.
You have no idea what is about to run you over.
A) Matthew Tinley
B) Terry Hardy
C) Bob McKnight
D) Kelly Slater
E) Greville Mitchell
Geez, I think I nearly threw up on my screen just then. If that's not the most corrupt group of individuals I have ever seen, I don't know what is,
For the record, I reckon Carroll is the only journo with the balls to slice though the hype.
The fact is that so far there are no facts.
A wise old journalist once told me it's best to follow the money in these cases, and guess what, so far there's no money, either.
I have absolutely no doubt that Kelly's acting out of what he perceives as the sport's best interests, he always means well and has been frustrated as fuck with the ASP for some time. And it may well be that the outcome will be a healthy advance for professional surfing as we know it.
However, a cold eye on history, both on TV sports networks' treatments of smaller pro sports and on new breakaway pro surfing super tour ideas, tells us they tend to wipe out.
Without facts or money anyway.
Till they show up, like I said, it's all smoke and mirrors.
The brands are freaking out because finally the surfers are realising they can stand together and get what they deserve- a professionally run tour. Not one completely dictated by surf brands who keep the ASP afloat. Not one goverened by a company who can't get their shit together to keep ONE single sponsor for the tour. Surfing finally has an opportunity to grow, sure there are kinks in this new tour that need to be ironed out- as in every new venture. But I think the effort to improve a tour that currently does not work, one that (as Dean put perfectly) is presented through a clothing brand's website should be applauded not ridiculed.
seems that everyone has either ignored or just doesn't want to admit it. surfing is in decline, at least with the general population. maybe it will cycle back into the limelight someday...but not anytime soon. you can rearrange the deck chairs (on the titanic) all you want.....but the fact remains....surfing is on the downswing. the girls are all but gone.....the old guys are dying out (or out riding their harleys) and the youth of america would rather be twittering than surfing. arguments and moaning by wct players smacks of self importance. guys....you're on your way out.....and NOBODY cares.
The fact is that the ASP has already taken its bat and ball away. It has a stranglehold on the surfers and what they can do. (Remember the "investigation" on Parko and Occy's Corona event in NZ?) The ASP has kept surfing a small fries sport with shit technology for webcasts and events owned by sponsors. Will this thing be worse for top pros and the progression of the sport? No chance.
What is interesting is that ESPN has not had much public to say (that I know of, anyway) and that most everything is being floated out there like smoke in the wind.
As someone who has been involved in the surfing industry for almost three decades as a journalist, event owner, athlete manager, etc.., I can from experience say that the ASP is a mess and has never reached its potential for either the organization or the athletes. Here we are coming off the biggest boom in the history of our sport and the ASP still has no big media deal or significant sponsors outside of the industry. From that point, it has been a failure but still it does crown an undisputed world champion and has done so for more than 30 years.
I have worked with many other professional sports organizations on the event side, and the ASP is the worst in terms of what they demand of and provide for event owners -- nevermind the athlete.
What really needs to be done is a complete overhaul of the ASP from the Top down. The surf bro' mentality has to go. Bring in educated and experienced people who not only know how to run organizations and events but especially know how to market and how to sell.
Rather than storming off in a new direction that may or may not work, the surfers need to overtake and exert their influence on the ASP as they are owners. Last I checked, the ASP is nothing without the surfers. And, to date, vice-verse.
So if ESPN can show me surf contests, on TV, as they happen, that I can watch on my 40" in HD, packaged with the guys i want to see surf, then I'm all for it.
The ASP is Australian-centric, almost xenophobic as are the surf companies and the management entrenched therein. A Rebel Tour would democratise surfing.
I'd love to see the Chinese surf. The central americans and southeast asians (whose geography gives them the best waves on the planet), and not just a bunch of overstaying obnoxious beer guzzling anglos crowding the line-up and for the most part, utterly disrespectful of the local culture. I would rather see Indonesians and Nicaraguans crowd their own line-up.
Huge population. Fast-growing middle-class. Consumerist aspirations. A big network with worldwide coverage will introduce surfing to a new young market numbering in the hundreds of millions trying out the joys of surfing IN THEIR OWN WATERS.
The big-money will professionalise surfing even more. May even introduce dope-testing. Which is good. A proliferation of cokeheads seem to populate the ASP ranks.
Lets hope they remain aligned with ASP, it would be a shame to see our sick sport go down the tube for the sake of a greedy few (not mentioning anyone!).
Good article Nick, great to finally hear someone talking sense. The ASP has been crucified by just about everyone else...
Only bored kooks really care about this argument.
'tis the season to be jolly, Parko's season 2009.
Kelly is a business man and after his tour of duty , he has to make a buck somewhere.
Let him do his so called 'dream tour', watch it fold underneath him, just like this year's WCT Tour "10" campaign.
ps -nice words nick, great stuff.
pps - beat it kelly, support the tour that has made you what you are. Park09!
The sport will become a mockery of itself, a hollow sideshow spectacle where nothing remains but marketing initiatives.
Hard-charging, rail-gouging surfers will be replaced by celebrity "it" muppets like Heidi and Spencer Pratt in favor or ratings, and I'll personally swallow a bit of throw-up every time it comes on television...and by television, I don't mean ESPN or even ESPN 2 (where the new tour is actually buying time).
No, the subjectivity and patheticness of Kelly's new tour will be lucky if it's even picked up by the Ocho network in a couple of years.
Retarding the progression of the sport, surfboards, athletes, etc. back a few decades and sending the whole community into very dark times indeed.
The surfers, like Kelly, are complaining that they're not receiving as much attention from the mainstream as other action sports (ie skateboarding, snowboarding, etc.)
This is incorrect. Other action sports actually envy professional surfing in that it has an established organization, the ASP, that crowns an undisputed world champ.
The other sports are not unlike boxing in that they have are disjointed and have no major impact upon society because infighting (much like Kelly and his management are creating here) has broken them apart.
We shouldn't be so quick to smash the ASP for all its flaws.
Besides, these boys need to get paid. They're some of the best athletes in the world. They deserve it.
http://www.grindtv.com/surf/blog/7226/inside+sources+separate+new+dream+tour+fact+from+fiction/
Fact 1: Kelly's renegotiation with a financially-struggling Quiksilver las December went poorly.
Fact 2: Both Kelly and his manager Terry Hardy were upset by the outcome of the renegotiation.
Fact 3: To make up for lack of financial rewards to keep Slater on, Quiksilver made a deal with the devil, Kelly and Hardy to back the new exhibition concept.
Fact 4: Bob McKnight (Quik CEO), whose company sits on the ASP Board), in what can only become an egregious conflict of interest, called a clandestine meeting of surf industry insiders before the Fourth of July to talk about the new exhibition concept.
The outcome...we cannot let these shady bastards glam their way into professional surfing. Protect the sport.
Kelly will work well in this case. Attractive champion. Something youthful Asians aspire for. He'll find funds outside of the surf industry easily considering the untapped markets of East Asia alone.
Australia is inconsequential. Sure they have good surfers. But the market is 20 million people. All already tapped and over-advertised to. So boring place in terms of growth. Small population vs the billions in southeast asia alone.
Yep, kelly will find the funds for this easily.
"Smoke and Mirrors" or "Wheres their Smoke theirs Fire",,Kellys backing raises a lot of issues regarding current ASP.
ASP events should be the showcase for state of the art surfing.
However ASP events are BOOORRRING,,,two safe waves ,,then take a risk.
The high performce,aeirals,new move action is all in the free surfing BEFORE the main event.
Because ASP judgeing format has never changed.
NEW ASP RULES - Beach and point breaks surf.Min two aeirals to score out of ten.
Freesurfing with coloured singlets.
On top of that, ESPN and the x-games have helped turned other action sports into respectable professions with something to watch for people who will likely never participate but are psyched to check it out.
If you're a magic eye in the sky/Nostradamus incarnate, I take back everything I just said.
Promotion firm America Presents down for count
By Dan Rafael, USA TODAY
Denver-based promotional company America Presents burst on the scene in 1996 with the signing of Olympic gold medalist David Reid and quickly established itself as a force.
It secured an exclusive deal to televise fights on Fox Sports Net and had contracts with top fighters such as David Tua, Hector Camacho Jr. and Joel Casamayor.
Now it's going down in flames under a heap of unpaid bills and lawsuits from fighters.
"We're going through a tough time, but we still have some good fighters," says embattled owner Mat Tinley. "I'm doing the best I can under difficult circumstances."
Jeff Fried, the company attorney who took over day-to-day operation after Tinley forced president Dan Goossen to resign...
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/boxing/stories/2002-03-22-america-presents.htm
Bring on the Super Tour....
Most of us sit back and have the privilege watch great surfing happen at, by and large, excellent events all around the world and take it for granted.
Considering as well that unlike most other sports you need to create significant but very short term infrastructure at sometimes remote locations, you also have to hope for good weather and get the ocean to play along, it's amazing any event ever happens.
I've spent this year back in Singapore and so no waves which means these webcasts are crucial to me to get a fix and keep me close to sane. They are patchy and occasionally the commentary can be cliched or just plain bad but then again when your staring out to a becalmed ocean during a 20 minute flat spell anyone would probably run out of things to say.
I hope we can see constant improvement in circuit and that the unsung heroes that keep all that is there now running don't get disillusioned by the current froth.
Because I would really hate to see some wankers exploiting some temporary issues take the whole thing back 10 years and destroy some more careers along the way.
I think it was ESPN's credibility!!!
Someone keeping us all honest !!
Nice work !